Saturday, February 2, 2008

Letter 1

I wonder what it would be like to be in a world without propaganda. Imagine a world where filmmakers, pundits, novelists, and preachers were telling stories without any spin. Imagine if everyone from politicians to parents just told things like it really is, instead of their perception of things.

Screwtape points out how we are surrounded with a flood of philosophies, e.g., materialism, skepticism, pragmatism…blaah! Who cares! There are so many and they all lead to different conclusions and ways of seeing reality.


Perhaps that is why people today seem to be like Screwtape describes. There are so many ways of thinking, many of which we’ve unconsciously have “dancing about together” inside our heads, that we had to stop thinking of them “as primarily ‘true’ or ‘false’.


I have to wonder if C.S. Lewis, through Screwtape, is onto something when he says, “Above all, do not attempt to use science (I mean, the real sciences) as a defense against Christianity.” Philosophers can have great insight into the world and truth, but at the end of the day philosophers’ arguments just have to make sense. Scientists, however, have to not only make sense, their ideas about reality have to be testable in the physical realm. Perhaps the best way to find the truth isn’t to think about it and write a paper on the results, but to actually live it out in the physical world.

Maybe—just maybe—that is why the God of the Old Testament, who never had a fully physical body within creation never said, “I am the truth” but Jesus, who believed himself to be the incarnation of that God, could say those very words. Perhaps Jesus’ experience in the physical realm gave him the right to say that not only is he promoting the ideas, he’s living them out in reality and testing them. And if his ideas do turn out to be true, than perhaps he’s not just another pundit, but a real (and rare) straight-talker.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

I do like this idea that you brought up about the physical world, and testable ideas. For I am a genetic student and do recreate life in many different ways with small organisms like fruit flies and rats. I have detailed insight first hand when it comes to our genetic make up and how things work in an organism and what order they do work in. For me though, my philosophical questions arise when I question why were we put together this way throughout evolution? What caused us to naturally select for these characteristics in our survival? Why do we select for certain sexual features, physical advantages, financial success, and etc?

Well the answers might be varied, due to the fact that throughout many years of selecting for different characteristics we became a very diverse population on Earth. Therefore, one answer cannot be defined on the behavioral level with one definition. The reasons for the question "Why" is complex, but the progress in organizing these thoughts have developed greatly. The biggest success is the answers that we tested for the question "How."

So even on the science level, we still ask questions for the unknown until another scientific, experimental result, further supports those ideas. Its a shame I cannot test a simple and obvious truth as a FACT, but one day we will be able to make most of those theories FACTS and I cannot wait for that day.

-Matt Tuscher